THE BARATELLI INSTITUTE · Mentoring at Scale
FOR EMPLOYERS & THEIR ADVISORS

Health insurance is the biggest hidden cost of US hiring.

Most owner-operators believe the only options are "expensive group health" or "no benefits." Seven viable strategies exist — and the difference between best and worst on a 10-employee firm runs $40-90K of annual cost at the same employee experience level. This tool compares all seven side-by-side, including the ALE-cliff math at 50 FTE that most growing firms hit without realizing it changed everything.

7
Strategies compared
50
FTE — ALE cliff
$15K
QSEHRA family cap
9.02%
Affordability threshold
YOUR DECISION
1
Your firm
2
Workforce
3
Cost assumptions
4
ALE check
5
Strategy comparison
STAGE 1 OF 5

Tell me about your firm

Defaults are typical for a 22-FTE professional services firm.

Including the owner if W-2. Two PT at 20 hrs = 1 FTE for ACA counting.
STAGE 2 OF 5

Workforce profile

Average wage drives ACA marketplace subsidy eligibility (which decides whether QSEHRA / ICHRA / wage-only beats group). Family mix drives total cost.

Salary or wage. Used for affordability test (ALE) and marketplace subsidy eligibility (Premium Tax Credit cuts off at 400% FPL — about $62,600 single in 2025).
$
Family coverage costs 2.8x single coverage. The mix matters more than firm size for total cost.
%
Not every employee enrolls. Spousal coverage, marketplace subsidy alternative, or "no thanks" reduce take-up. Most employer plans run 70-90% take-up.
%
Why workforce wage matters. If most of your employees earn under 400% FPL (~$62K single, ~$129K family of 4), they qualify for ACA marketplace premium tax credits. That can make ICHRA, QSEHRA, or wage-only strategies dramatically cheaper than group — because the federal government is effectively subsidizing the employee's premium. For a workforce earning under $50K, marketplace + subsidies often beat group health on net employee experience.
STAGE 3 OF 5

Cost assumptions

Defaults reflect 2025 industry averages (Kaiser Family Foundation, eHealth, Mercer). Adjust if you have actual quotes.

2025 KFF average: $8,950. Low-cost states ~$7,500; high-cost states ~$10,500.
$
2025 KFF average: $25,572. Low-cost states ~$22,000; high-cost states ~$30,000.
$
% of premium paid by employer. National average: 83% single. Below 75% triggers affordability concerns at lower wages.
%
% of family premium paid by employer. National average: 73% family. Many small firms use 50/50 to keep cost manageable.
%
2025 cap: $512.50/mo single ($6,150/yr). You can offer less. Tax-free to employee for qualified medical expenses + premiums.
$
2025 cap: $1,037.50/mo family ($12,450/yr). Maxed out, this fully replaces a small employer's group health for many family budgets.
$
No cap on ICHRA — you set the contribution. Common: $400-$700/mo single. Can vary by employee class (FT vs PT, geography, age band).
$
Common ICHRA family contribution: $1,000-$1,500/mo. The advantage over QSEHRA is no cap, so you can be generous on family.
$
Level-funded vs fully-insured. Level-funded plans price 10-25% below fully-insured for healthy populations because you absorb claim variability up to a stop-loss limit. The trade: if claims spike (one cancer case can run $200K+), your year-end true-up is meaningful. Most level-funded plans return surplus if claims undershoot — making them attractive for healthy small firms but risky for older/higher-utilization workforces.
STAGE 4 OF 5

Applicable Large Employer (ALE) check

The ACA changed everything at 50 FTE. Below 50 you have full strategic flexibility. At 50+ you're an Applicable Large Employer subject to the §4980H "shared responsibility" mandate — and the penalties are designed to be roughly equal to the cost of group health, eliminating the "skip it" option for ALEs.

§4980H penalty mechanics

§4980H(a) — "no offer" penalty. If you don't offer minimum essential coverage to 95%+ of FT employees AND at least one FT employee receives a marketplace subsidy: $2,970 per FT employee per year (2025) × (Total FT − 30). The −30 is a fixed exemption.

§4980H(b) — "unaffordable offer" penalty. If you do offer MEC but it's "unaffordable" (lowest-cost option exceeds 9.02% of household income for 2025) AND a FT employee gets a marketplace subsidy: $4,460 per affected employee per year (2025).

The penalty is non-deductible. Unlike health insurance premiums, the §4980H tax can't be deducted as a business expense — making it ~30% more expensive in after-tax terms.

STAGE 5 OF 5 · STRATEGY COMPARISON

Your seven options

—
—
$—

Annual cost by strategy

Total employer cost. The cheapest viable option vs. your current setup is highlighted in green; non-viable options (e.g., QSEHRA at 50+ FTE) are flagged.

Side-by-side comparison

Recommendations

PAIRS WITH
CFO & Controller's Guide · CPA in a Box
The CFO Guide covers the full benefits-strategy chapter — including the §125 cafeteria plan, HSA / HDHP optimization, group-health renewal-cycle playbook, and the QSEHRA / ICHRA implementation guide. CPAs advising clients on this question will want the full library cross-reference. Subscribe to the library →
CFO & CONTROLLER'S GUIDE

The full benefits-strategy chapter — by email.

Plan-design framework, RFP language, broker-vs-direct decision, HSA / HDHP / FSA optimization, dependent-coverage strategy, and the renewal-cycle playbook that gets your firm a better deal year over year.

Cost estimates use 2025 industry averages (Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits Survey, Mercer National Survey, eHealth Small Business). Your actual quotes will vary based on age/gender mix, claims history, plan design, geography, and broker. The §4980H penalty calculations assume statutory 2025 amounts ($2,970 / $4,460); these are inflation-adjusted annually. State-level requirements (e.g., Massachusetts Health Connector, Hawaii Prepaid Health Care) and certain industry exclusions are not modeled. This is not legal, tax, or benefits advice. Engage a benefits broker or qualified ERISA / employment counsel before making changes.
WANT THE METHODOLOGY BEHIND THIS TOOL?
This calculator is one chapter of CFO & Controller's Reference Guide.
The tool gives you the answer. The guide gives you the argument — the case law, the worked examples, the negotiation playbook, the cross-check tables, the exception cases. Read the chapter and you can defend your number to a board, a buyer, an examiner, or a counterparty.
The methodology behind this calculator is in Ch 30 Treasury & Banking of the reference guide.
See the Guide → Browse all 22 guides
PROFESSIONAL DISCLAIMER · PLEASE READ

Educational and informational purposes only. This calculator and any output it produces are intended solely for general educational and decision-support purposes. They do not constitute investment, tax, legal, accounting, appraisal, lending, insurance, or any other professional advice, and they do not create a fiduciary, attorney-client, accountant-client, or advisor-client relationship of any kind.

Estimates based on your inputs. All results are estimates derived from the data and assumptions you provide. Tax law, accounting standards, regulations, market conditions, and the specific facts of your situation can materially change the answer. The Baratelli Institute, its affiliates, and any co-branding professional make no warranty of accuracy, completeness, currency, or fitness for any particular purpose, and disclaim all liability for decisions made in reliance on the output.

Consult your own qualified professionals. Before acting on anything calculated here, consult your own attorney, CPA, financial advisor, appraiser, lender, or other qualified professional licensed in your jurisdiction who has reviewed your specific facts and applicable current law. The Baratelli Institute is a publisher of practitioner reference material. It is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, law firm, accounting firm, appraisal firm, or lender.

Co-branded versions: If a professional advisor's name and contact information appear on this tool, that advisor has elected to make the tool available to clients as a courtesy. Inclusion of an advisor's name does not constitute the advisor's endorsement of any specific result, nor does it transfer professional responsibility for the underlying methodology to that advisor. The disclaimer above applies regardless of co-branding.