An independent review of a business's earnings: every add-back tested against the general ledger, the revenue proved to the bank deposits, and the earnings a lender can rely on — with the support for each number attached.
A seller's recast is an assertion. A quality of earnings is that assertion tested, line by line, against the records that would exist whether or not anyone was selling: the ledger, the bank statements, the payroll reports, the Forms W-3 and the agings. Where an add-back is supported, the report says what supports it. Where it is not, the report says so and removes it.
A fixed fee, quoted in writing from the document list before any work starts. Fifteen business days from complete information. Half on signing, half on delivery — and the fee never depends on whether the transaction closes or on what the report finds. Reviewed and signed by a US CPA.
Three words in that paragraph do the work. Independent rules out the company's own accountant and anyone whose fee moves with the outcome. Ordered by the lender rules out the report the seller already has, however good it is — and a seller frequently does already have one, which is the most common surprise on these files. And proof of cash rules out a recast built from the income statement alone: deposits have to be reconciled to recorded revenue across the trailing twelve months and the two fiscal years before it, which is the single procedure a thin report most often omits.
The consequence for the file is that the earnings figure in front of credit has to be one the lender procured. The Baratelli Credit Services desk also reads eligibility, size, use of proceeds and the change-of-ownership conditions against the SOP as a separate engagement, so the exceptions on a file can be named before it reaches committee.
The report SOP 50 10 8.1 requires on a change of ownership at $3 million or more. Proof of cash for the trailing twelve months and the last two fiscal years, every seller add-back tested against the ledger, wages tied to Forms W-3, and the earnings the credit decision can rest on. Engaged by the lender, independent of the buyer, the seller and the company.
The earnings behind the price, before signing. Add-backs tested rather than accepted, revenue proved to the deposits, working capital measured against a normal level rather than against the closing balance, and the debt-like items the price should carry identified while there is still a negotiation to have. A buyer who learns in month three what a report would have said in week two has paid for the information twice.
A seller's own review before going to market. Stated plainly: it does not satisfy the lender's requirement — that report has to be ordered by the lender — and nobody should buy it believing otherwise. What it does is find the issues while there is still time to fix them, which is the difference between a price adjustment at closing and a clean file at launch.
The organizing principle is that nothing is accepted because it appeared in a summary. Every figure that survives into the report is a figure traced to a document that exists for a reason other than this transaction — a bank statement, a filed payroll return, an aging the company runs to collect money.
| Procedure | What it is, and why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is the revenue real | |
| Proof of cash | Bank deposits reconciled to recorded revenue across the trailing twelve months and the last two fiscal years. This is the procedure SOP 50 10 8.1 names, and it is the one that catches revenue the books record and the bank never saw. |
| Revenue proved to deposits | Recorded revenue tied back to money that actually arrived, period by period, with the differences explained rather than netted. |
| Year-end cut-off | Whether revenue and expenses landed in the period they belong to, or were moved across a year-end to shape a trend. |
| Are the add-backs real | |
| Every seller add-back tested | Each one tested against the general ledger rather than accepted from the recast. An add-back that cannot be located in the ledger does not survive into the earnings figure. |
| Personal charges | Owner expenses run through the business: identified, quantified and either added back with support or left where they are. |
| Manual entries | Journal entries made by hand rather than generated by a transaction, which is where a figure gets adjusted without a document behind it. |
| Wages against Forms W-3 | Payroll in the books reconciled to the payroll actually filed. A wage add-back that disagrees with the W-3 is the most common defect in a seller recast. |
| What the price should carry | |
| Customer concentration | Measured, not characterized. A business where two customers are most of the revenue is a different credit from one where fifty are, at the same earnings. |
| Working capital | Measured against a normal level rather than the closing balance, which is what determines whether the buyer is funding the business or funding a hole on day one. |
| Debt-like items | Deferred revenue, accrued but unpaid obligations, capital leases and the rest — the items that behave like debt in the price even when they are not called debt on the balance sheet. |
This list is the standing scope. The engagement letter names the procedures performed on a specific file, and a procedure not listed in that letter was not performed — see the scope section below.
The earnings figure, the bridge from the reported figure to it, every adjustment with the document it rests on, the exceptions found, and the items the price should carry. Written to be read by a credit committee rather than by another accountant.
Live formulas, not a printout pasted into a grid. A lender can re-run coverage at its own terms, a buyer can test a different price, and either can see which inputs the conclusion is sensitive to without asking for a revision.
Signed by the company. It records what management asserted, which is what makes it visible later which figures rested on an assertion rather than on a document.
A US CPA reviews and signs every report before it is delivered.
| Purchase price | Turnaround | Fee basis |
|---|---|---|
| Up to $3 million | 15 business days | Fixed, quoted from the document list |
| $3 million to $6 million | 15 business days | Fixed, quoted from the document list |
| Over $6 million | 15 business days | Fixed, quoted from the document list |
The client signs an engagement letter. It names who engaged this desk, confirms independence from the buyer, the seller and the company in writing, fixes the fee, and states the scope — including the non-attest character of the work.
The company uploads through a private, encrypted link. Any accounting system works. Owners keeping books in Baratelli Bankable send the whole set in one click.
The procedures above, run against the source documents. Questions go back in one consolidated list rather than one at a time, because a company answering a trickle of emails is a company whose file takes three months.
A US CPA reviews and signs. The report, the workbook and the signed representation letter are delivered together.
The fifteen business days run from the day the last of these arrives. It is published here rather than sent after signing so that a lender, a buyer or a broker can tell in advance whether a company is in a position to be reviewed at all — which is frequently the real question.
A lender relies on the earnings figure to make a credit decision, so the character of the engagement belongs on the face of the page rather than only in the letter. A quality of earnings is a non-attest consulting engagement. It is not an audit, a review, a compilation, an examination or any other attestation engagement, and it is not performed under the AICPA attestation standards.
No, on a change-of-ownership 7(a) file at $3 million or more. SOP 50 10 8.1 requires the report to be ordered by the lender, and a seller-commissioned report does not qualify however thorough it is. It is still worth reading — it names the add-backs the seller believes in, which is where the testing starts.
Not if it is bought for what it does. It will not satisfy the lender. It will find the problems before a buyer's advisor does, at a stage where they can be fixed rather than priced. The free sale readiness check is the place to start, because it will tell a seller whether a paid review is premature.
Bank statements, in almost every case — a missing month, or an account nobody mentioned. The proof of cash cannot be built around a gap. The clock runs from complete information for this reason, and the intake list above is published so the gap can be found before the engagement rather than during it.
No. Any accounting system works, the records are what get tested either way, and the fee is the same. Bankable is free, and a company that has run its loan-readiness screens arrives with the package already in the layout this desk asks for — which shortens the engagement but is not a condition of it.
The sample quality of earnings report and its workbook are available on request. Reading an actual deliverable is a better basis for a decision than reading a page about one.
Philip A. Baratelli, CPA
philbaratelli@gmail.com
904-846-3011
baratelliinstitute.com