← All 73 Cost of Equity references
Consumer Staples ยท Household Products

The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) — Cost of Equity

The CAPM cost of equity for The Procter & Gamble Company at 2026-06-30. A practitioner reference for equity-only discount rates — dividend discount models, residual-income frameworks, and the Ke input in enterprise-value DCFs. Sourced inputs, transparent walkthrough, refreshed quarterly.

Snapshot: 2026-06-30 · Next refresh: 2026-09-30 · Companion WACC page: PG WACC →

Cost of Equity (CAPM)
7.50%
Rf + β × ERP
Beta
0.55
5-yr weekly, Blume-adjusted
Risk-free rate
4.25%
10-yr US Treasury
Equity Risk Premium
5.55%
Damodaran, June 2026

The CAPM Calculation, Walked

ComponentValueSource / Assumption
Risk-free rate (Rf)4.25%10-year US Treasury yield at snapshot date
Beta (β)0.555-year weekly regression vs S&P 500, Blume-adjusted
Equity risk premium (ERP)5.55%Damodaran implied ERP, June 2026 update
Cost of Equity (Ke)7.50%CAPM: Rf + β × ERP = 4.25% + 0.55 × 5.55%

Fama-French Three-Factor Alternative

CAPM is the practitioner default because it's defensible in a boardroom in one line. But the Fama-French three-factor model adds a size premium (SMB) and a value premium (HML) that meaningfully improve fit on empirical returns. For The Procter & Gamble Company, the illustrative FF3 cost of equity is:

FactorLoadingPremiumContribution
Market (Rm − Rf)0.555.55%3.05%
Size (SMB) — illustrative loading 0.200.201.10%0.22%
Value (HML) — illustrative loading 0.150.151.85%0.28%
Risk-free base4.25%
Fama-French Ke7.80%

Practitioner note: the SMB and HML loadings above are illustrative reference values. For a defensible FF3 estimate, run a five-year monthly regression against the Fama-French factor series and use the empirical loadings. FF3 typically shifts Ke by 30-90 bps versus CAPM for large-cap issuers — enough to matter, not enough to change the recommendation on most valuations.

Levered vs. Unlevered Beta Reconciliation

The published beta of 0.55 reflects The Procter & Gamble Company's current capital structure. Practitioners doing peer-based valuation (or a re-lever for a target capital structure) should decompose:

StepValueFormula
Observed (levered) beta0.555-yr weekly regression, Blume-adjusted
Assumed D/E0.15Market values from the companion WACC page
Assumed tax rate21%Blended federal + state
Unlevered beta (asset beta)0.49βL / [1 + (1 − t) × D/E]

Use the unlevered beta when the peer's capital structure differs materially from the target's. Re-lever at the target D/E before feeding back into CAPM.

Sensitivity: β × ERP Grid

Cost of equity for The Procter & Gamble Company at various beta and ERP combinations (risk-free rate held at 4.25%):

Beta \ ERP4.75%5.25%5.55%5.85%6.35%
0.355.91%6.09%6.19%6.30%6.47%
0.456.39%6.61%6.75%6.88%7.11%
0.556.86%7.14%7.30%7.47%7.74%
0.657.34%7.66%7.86%8.05%8.38%
0.757.81%8.19%8.41%8.64%9.01%

What This Means for The Procter & Gamble Company Valuation

A cost of equity of 7.50% is the equity-only discount rate to plug into a dividend discount model, a residual-income model, or any framework that discounts flows accruing solely to equityholders. If you're building an enterprise-value DCF, use the companion WACC of 7.1% instead — Ke feeds into WACC through the equity weight, but is not itself the enterprise discount rate.

For The Procter & Gamble Company specifically, the beta of 0.55 anchors the calculation. Where practitioners will reasonably disagree: whether to use a raw historical beta, a Blume-adjusted beta (the Baratelli reference default), or an industry-median beta. Blume-adjusted pulls the estimate toward 1.0 on the theory that betas revert over long horizons; industry-median smooths noise for issuers with thin trading history. All three are defensible; the recommendation is to disclose which convention you're using and hold it constant across peer comparisons.

Practitioner Caveats

On historical beta: five-year weekly betas are a lagging indicator. Companies undergoing a business-model shift (energy transitions, hardware-to-software pivots, deleveraging) will look mispriced under a historical beta. The correct response is a forward-looking overlay, not blind reliance on the regression.

On Damodaran ERP: the 5.55% ERP is the June 2026 implied premium from Damodaran's monthly update — the defensible reference across the practitioner community. Historical arithmetic-average ERPs (7%+) overstate today's premium; historical geometric averages (5.0-5.5%) triangulate close to the implied number.

The full cost-of-equity walkthrough, the FF3 template, and 25 other Wall Street models are in the Baratelli Financial Modeling Toolkit — $99.

Cite This Page

Baratelli Institute. “The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) — Cost of Equity.” Baratelli Cost of Equity Reference. Snapshot date 2026-06-30.
https://baratelliinstitute.com/cost-of-equity/pg.html

Related Cost of Equity References

All 73 companies in the Baratelli Cost of Equity reference: The full Cost of Equity Reference Library (73 companies) — sorted, filterable.

Companion WACC calculation: The PG WACC reference — adds after-tax cost of debt and capital-structure weighting.

DCF methodology hub: The Baratelli DCF Reference — where Ke and WACC actually get used.

Interactive calculator: The WACC + Cost of Equity calculator — substitute your own inputs.