Home · Case Studies · Entertainment Division
CASE STUDY · PRACTITIONER DECK

Paramount Skydance / Warner Bros. Discovery

The $110 billion megamerger — federal cleared, twelve states suing.

On February 2, 2026, Paramount Skydance announced the $110 billion all-cash acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. WBD shareholders approved 99% on April 23. Twelve state attorneys general filed suit on July 13 to block it. On July 31, David Ellison pivoted to a straight-to-trial strategy and added Beth Wilkinson to the legal bench. This is the 33-slide practitioner deck — every number tied to the filed 8-K Exhibit 99.2 pro forma, including combined pro-forma income statement (FY2025) and balance sheet (3/31/2026).

$110BEnterprise value
$77.8BCash to WBD holders
$46.95BEllison Trust PIPE
12 statesN.D. Cal. suit
$7M / dayTicking fee post-9/30

What this case covers

Thirty-two practitioner slides organized in four blocks: (1) situation setup — cover, executive summary, transaction factsheet, timeline; (2) deal mechanics & financing — structure, sources & uses, cap stack, and the $46.95B PIPE detail; (3) pro-forma financials & valuation — the combined pro-forma income statement (FY2025) and balance sheet (3/31/2026) rebuilt from the filed 8-K Exhibit 99.2, ASC 805 purchase price allocation, sum-of-the-parts segment build, and cost synergy build; (4) portfolio deep-dive plus governance & regulatory posture including the 12-state antitrust complaint and the straight-to-trial gamble.

Every quantitative claim is tied to a filed document.

Purchase price, sources and uses, PIPE syndication, PPA intangibles, combined-entity balance sheet, and the pro forma cash position are all anchored to Paramount Skydance Form 8-K Exhibit 99.2 (Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements) filed February 2, 2026. Peer multiples and precedent transactions cite the filed 10-Ks of each named company.

The July 31 update — straight-to-trial gamble

Landing-page commentary only. This reflects post-finalization Wall Street Journal reporting and is not currently incorporated into the deck PDF.

Per the Wall Street Journal (July 31, 2026), David Ellison and chief legal officer Makan Delrahim have elected to bypass the preliminary-injunction fight and go straight to trial on the merits. Paramount is pushing for November 4, 2026; the state AGs' coalition is pushing for April 5, 2027. Judge Martínez-Olguín rules on schedule in the coming days. Paramount has added trial attorney Beth Wilkinson — who successfully defended Microsoft's $75 billion Activision Blizzard acquisition against the same lead counsel now representing the state AGs. California Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed concerns to Bonta's office about the Hollywood-employment impact of blocking the deal, per the WSJ. Paramount is also considering incentives to persuade individual states to drop out of the coalition. Deal has cleared regulatory review in 65 jurisdictions globally.

The August 4 update — Q2'26 print and raised full-year guide

Landing-page commentary only. The Q2’26 disclosures below post-date the deck’s finalization and are not currently incorporated into the 33-slide deck PDF; they are captured here as an Institute reader update on standalone-Paramount trajectory while the WBD merger is pending.

Paramount Skydance filed its Q2'26 shareholder letter on August 4, 2026, the first full standalone quarter one year after the Skydance-close (the letter frames itself as "one year in"). Highlights (all sourced to the shareholder letter):

Two-line practitioner read against the deck: the standalone-Paramount trajectory is materially stronger in Q2 than the case's baseline PF-2025 print implied, which tightens rather than loosens the Ellison-side argument that Paramount can execute standalone if the merger is blocked. The raised full-year Adj. EBITDA guide of $3.8–$3.9B is on top of the $3.8B floor previously cited in the deck; the incremental $0–$100M is small in synergy terms but signals directional over-execution. The Q2'26 print does not change the deal terms, the $46.95B Ellison-Trust PIPE architecture, the 12-state suit, or the trial-schedule fight.

What the deck answers

Download the deck

Practitioner Deck (PDF) 33 slides · setup + financing + PF financials & valuation + portfolio + governance & regulatory

Cross-references in the Institute library

What’s published on this case. The Institute’s published artifact for this case is the 33-slide practitioner deck linked above — that is the only downloadable Institute document. Every quantitative claim inside the deck is tied to Paramount Skydance Form 8-K Exhibit 99.2 (Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements, filed February 2, 2026) plus the underlying company 10-Ks referenced within. The “July 31 update” and “August 4 update” blocks on this landing page are web-only Institute commentary reflecting information disclosed after the deck was finalized (the Wall Street Journal straight-to-trial reporting of July 31, 2026 and the Paramount Skydance Q2’26 shareholder letter of August 4, 2026, respectively). Those two blocks are not currently rendered into the deck PDF. If a full deck refresh incorporating post-finalization disclosures is published later, this line will be updated to reflect it.

Disclosure. Independent editorial analysis by The Baratelli Institute. Not investment advice. Not legal or tax advice. Regulatory posture and financial disclosures on this landing page reflect information available as of August 5, 2026. The Baratelli Institute is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Paramount Skydance Corporation, Warner Bros. Discovery, or any party to the transaction. Marks are the property of their respective owners.